tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36880087.post2851308963947986624..comments2024-03-05T08:25:01.029-05:00Comments on Poker Grump: Where I winRakewellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15873391354585352712noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36880087.post-16409204529201713612011-05-08T21:34:58.896-04:002011-05-08T21:34:58.896-04:00I would think that your "losers" would t...I would think that your "losers" would tend to stay "losers" as you would tend to visit them less often given previous history. If you lose at, say, The Flamingo, you're likely to frequent The Flamingo much less. This could lead to conistentcy in "losers" that may be unfounded given the relatively small sample size. That being said I can't blame you for frequenting your "winners." :)Bostonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36880087.post-22419447998301754422011-05-08T21:07:39.217-04:002011-05-08T21:07:39.217-04:00Wynn and Bellagio are less than 5 each. MGM has a ...Wynn and Bellagio are less than 5 each. MGM has a lot, though.Rakewellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15873391354585352712noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36880087.post-81315617755284977222011-05-08T20:38:32.383-04:002011-05-08T20:38:32.383-04:00Just curious how many rooms qualified under the 5 ...Just curious how many rooms qualified under the 5 and 10 session criteria? I only ask to see if it can be tied into the statistics. If places like Wynn, MGM, and Bellagio are very low in the number of visits/wins in the criteria, you probably could make a bit of an assumption that your most profitable time is with jackpot tourists or local nits. Obviously that means no more then the stats posted, but it's how I would approach it and it's one thing I do like taking a look at is trends and things from data like this.Michaelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17190937282558817928noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36880087.post-91783046767803366002011-05-08T09:24:55.578-04:002011-05-08T09:24:55.578-04:00Hi sir
Wondering why bills is so profitable as I ...Hi sir<br /><br />Wondering why bills is so profitable as I understood was just a dollar big blind?<br /><br />ThanksAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36880087.post-88917519973378423812011-05-08T02:36:55.510-04:002011-05-08T02:36:55.510-04:00I was going to suggest that the tops of your lists...I was going to suggest that the tops of your lists tended to represent rooms with high ratios of "easy pickins": many relatively unskilled players (tourists, especially rich young ones, and/or rocky locals) and few pros or experts. This would be a decent description of what one might consider to be the ideal environment for profitable poker.<br /><br />But the existence of Venetian and (to some degree) Orleans makes me suspicious of that reasoning. Although I will admit I mainly specialize in tournaments, V and O strike me as being significantly more likely to attract skilled players and pros to feed on the fish (especially the Venetian, I would think).<br /><br />I do note that the non-presence of heavy-hitter locations like Bellagio, Mirage, Wynn and Aria (admittedly, I see you just haven't logged many sessions in Aria yet) have me still leaning towards my original thinking.<br /><br />Perhaps the cash games at Venetian and Orleans have a significantly higher fish-to-pro ratio than their tourneys?Mark Tnoreply@blogger.com