Click on the first picture, and then on the right/left arrows to move forward or backward in the series.
Ode To Rust
All the things I hate about the game I love
Posted by
Rakewell
at
2:49 PM
0
comments
Labels: photography
This was published Monday, but I was out of town so didn't put up a notice here. It's about handling disputes at the poker table:
http://www.pokernews.com/strategy/how-to-handle-disputes-when-playing-poker-in-a-casino-20435.htm
Posted by
Rakewell
at
10:24 AM
0
comments
Labels: pokernews
Head on over to the Craakker blog for a very interesting two-part reflection on what the news of heads-up limit poker being "solved" says about skill versus luck in poker:
http://craakker.blogspot.com/2015/01/pokers-deus-ex-machina-part-i-how.html
and
http://craakker.blogspot.com/2015/01/pokers-deus-ex-machina-part-ii-how.html
Posted by
Rakewell
at
12:28 PM
1 comments
Labels: luck, other blogs
I don't think I saw this back in 2010 when it happened, but take a close look at the cards in the winning hand in the photo accompanying this story.
Too bad such a good thing happened to a poker cheat, which is the lowest form of life.
Hat tip: Grange95.
Posted by
Rakewell
at
3:40 PM
0
comments
Labels: deuce-four
The winning secret to seat selection:
http://www.pokernews.com/strategy/the-winning-secret-to-seat-selection-20356.htm
Posted by
Rakewell
at
12:09 PM
0
comments
Labels: pokernews
Yesterday Nina and I tried what was a completely new experience for both of us: watching a cyclocross race. It was held at the famous Biltmore Estate, which is just a couple of miles from Nina's house. Cyclocross is sort of like a steeplechase for cyclists. It's cross-country, meaning mostly not on pavement, but with nasty obstacles thrown in, like giant mudholes, and hills that are too steep to ride.
Nina has a new camera, and we both thought it would be fun to try our hands at fast action shots. It gave me a new appreciation for professional sports photographers. It is not easy to anticipate what will be worth taking a picture of, when it will happen, how to frame the shot to capture both the action and the competitor's face, and do all that while being aware of light/shadow conditions, obstacles, extraneous elements, and a hundred other things.
We watched a 45-minute race that actually included separate men's and women's races with staggered starts. We paid no attention to who was winning, but just enjoyed watching them negotiate tricky spots on the course. Much of our time was spent at a nasty series of hairpin turns coming steeply down the side of a hill. The men were mostly looking pretty stoic, but the women tended to wear their emotions on their faces, showing pain, determination, alarm, or even elation:
Posted by
Rakewell
at
3:23 PM
3
comments
Labels: asheville, biking, not poker-related, photography
I don't find any details of how the hand played out, but see the photo here.
Hat tip: @ohcowboy12go
Posted by
Rakewell
at
10:41 AM
1 comments
Labels: deuce-four
Add just a little bit of aggression to your game:
http://www.pokernews.com/strategy/kick-it-up-a-notch-add-a-bit-of-aggression-to-your-game-20288.htm
Posted by
Rakewell
at
12:37 PM
1 comments
Labels: pokernews
Andrew Brokos, aka Foucault, proprietor of Thinking Poker, has just blogged about winning a $9000 pot in a $5/10 game, holding 2c-4c, and rivering a straight to beat his opponent's top set. Pretty much routine for the most powerful hand in poker, but it's nice to have another convert to the Holy Order of the Mighty Deuce-Four.
Thanks to Memphis Mojo for bringing this development to my attention.
Posted by
Rakewell
at
12:31 PM
2
comments
Labels: brokos, deuce-four
This one is on how poker can mess with the experiential learning mechanism that nature has given us, so that we learn all the wrong things.
http://www.pokernews.com/strategy/responding-to-results-or-the-jack-four-effect-20213.htm
And please note once again the charming custom graphic that my editor created for this piece!
Posted by
Rakewell
at
5:33 PM
3
comments
Labels: pokernews
It's been a while, so maybe it's time for a refresher course on the key factor in successfully playing The Mighty Deuce-Four.
Last night I was at Harrah's Cherokee, using the PokerPro tables for some $1-2 NLHE. I had started with $300, and after about two hours was down to about $200, when I caught 2-4 for the first time--offsuit, both black.
I was in the small blind. We had three limpers including the cutoff. Button raised to $16. I called, BB called.
Now it got weird: Cutoff, who had the biggest stack of around $600, reraised to $37. A limp-reraise from late position? Who does that? I think I've seen only two kinds of hands played that way: A-K and medium pairs. I assume that in both cases, these players are thinking roughly along these lines: "This is a hand that is hard to play after the flop unless it improves in a very specific way, which it usually doesn't. Therefore, I'd either like to play it very cheaply, or put in a prohibitive pre-flop raise and end the hand." I don't recall ever seeing anybody play K-K or A-A like this from late position.
Anyway, the button called. I called, of course, since I had the best hand. Besides, I felt in my bones that I was going to flop big. In my bones, I tell you.
Surprisingly, the BB called, too, making the pot a bloated $145 or so before we even had a flop out.
Flop: A-4-4 rainbow.
Of course.
I pleaded with the poker gods: "Oh, please let him have A-K, not a medium pair."
I checked. BB checked. Cutoff bet $50. Button folded. I called. BB folded.
Turn: 7 of the fourth suit. Excellent.
I checked. Cutoff bet $75. I had $112 left. I figured he was thoroughly pot-committed. With me all-in, the pot would be about $430, and he'd only have to call $37 more to stay in. He should do that with just about anything. And he did. The computer revealed our hands. He had J-J. Two outs.
River: King. My old friend the Deuce-Four had done it for me again.
I heard the murmurings around the table: "Are you kidding me?" "I did not expect to see those two hands." "Wow." I just took it in stride. I couldn't feign surprise, since I had known I would win.
When people tell me that they have lost with 2-4, I usually tell them that they didn't play it right. Most often what they do wrong is fail to believe in it. My stock reply is this: "Does Santa bring presents to little boys and girls who do not believe in him? No, he does not. It's the same with Deuce-Four. You have to believe in it for it to work."
I believe.
Posted by
Rakewell
at
3:29 AM
10
comments
Labels: deuce-four, Harrah's Cherokee
I saw a picture of Senator Ted Cruz somewhere, and at first glance I thought it was Phil Hellmuth. I looked more carefully, and came to think that they are twins separated at birth. What do you think?
Posted by
Rakewell
at
2:53 PM
2
comments
Labels: hellmuth
Posted by
Rakewell
at
11:34 AM
2
comments
Labels: cat
This one is all about how to get yourself lost in a poker hand with no idea what how to proceed--in case that's something you want to do.
http://www.pokernews.com/strategy/want-to-get-to-poker-s-no-man-s-land-here-s-a-map-20190.htm
Take note of the cute graphic--fake iPhone map directions--that my editor, Short-Stacked Shamus, made to illustrate the article. Nice touch!
Posted by
Rakewell
at
5:40 PM
0
comments
Labels: pokernews
How to recognize--and beat--the unbluffable player.
http://www.pokernews.com/strategy/how-to-recognize-and-beat-the-unbluffable-player-20103.htm
Posted by
Rakewell
at
11:25 AM
1 comments
Labels: pokernews
Should you look at your cards right away or only when it's your turn?
http://www.pokernews.com/strategy/which-is-correct-look-at-your-cards-right-away-or-wait-until-20029.htm
Posted by
Rakewell
at
10:54 AM
0
comments
Labels: pokernews
Revealed: The single best way to recover from a bad beat.
http://www.pokernews.com/strategy/revealed-the-single-best-way-to-recover-from-a-bad-beat-19955.htm
ADDENDUM
Apparently, this article rubbed somebody the wrong way:
Posted by
Rakewell
at
12:09 PM
2
comments
Labels: pokernews
If you want to win more at poker, start by losing less:
http://www.pokernews.com/strategy/2-things-you-need-to-do-to-cut-your-poker-losses-19917.htm
Posted by
Rakewell
at
3:19 PM
2
comments
Labels: pokernews
http://existentialcomics.com/comic/55
Just go take a look at it, for a laugh.
Hat tip: Ed Miller.
Posted by
Rakewell
at
9:54 AM
0
comments
Labels: funny
When strong means weak:
http://www.pokernews.com/strategy/when-strong-means-weak-the-chip-grabbing-tell-19843.htm
Posted by
Rakewell
at
11:33 AM
0
comments
Labels: pokernews