Thursday, July 26, 2012


Interesting rule dilemma about whether a conditional verbal declaration is binding, illustrated by a story from Rob:

My rather lengthy comments are there, so I won't repeat them here.


Rob said...

Thanks for the link, Grump, always appreciate that.

In my response to your thoughtful analysis, I did correct one misunderstanding you had (probably my fault for not being clear) so you may want to take a look at that. Hopefully it doesn't make your entire response invalid. :)

Crash said...

OFF thread-
Your 24 is crap. Are u joking? It just doesn't work more than good hands.
I like your blog and your girlfriend, but 24 is just silly.

Crash said...

Well, I apologize for the harshness of my comment. I have the sinking feeling that everyone except me knew it was to be funny. Sorry. Great blog.